Prediction of Emilija Ceranic vs Eden Sophie Schlagenhauf Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Ceranic vs E. Sophie Schlagenhauf

Emilija Ceranic
BIH
l
w
l
w
w
w
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
31
Age
26
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Eden Sophie Schlagenhauf
GER
l
w
l
l
w
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
31
Age
26
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Ceranic 1 - 0 Schlagenhauf
They have played 2 sets in total, with Emilija Ceranic winning 2 and Eden Sophie Schlagenhauf winning 0. The last match between Emilija Ceranic and Eden Sophie Schlagenhauf was at the Nuernberg, 22-08-2016, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Emilija Ceranic getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ceranic | 1 |
| Schlagenhauf | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Nuernberg(08-22-16)
Emilija Ceranic
6
6
Eden Sophie Schlagenhauf
3
1
E. Ceranic vs E. S. Schlagenhauf H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 37.74% (20-33) | Career Total W/L | 32.26% (10-21) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. Ceranic vs E. S. Schlagenhauf Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Emilija Ceranic has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Eden Sophie Schlagenhauf has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Emilija Ceranic, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Eden Sophie Schlagenhauf has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Emilija Ceranic has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Eden Sophie Schlagenhauf has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Emilija Ceranic has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Eden Sophie Schlagenhauf winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Emilija Ceranic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 39% (W/L 19/30), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/2). Eden Sophie Schlagenhauf has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 39% (W/L 2/4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 32% (W/L 8/17).
- Player level: In the last year, Emilija Ceranic has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Eden Sophie Schlagenhauf has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Emilija Ceranic winning 1 times and Eden Sophie Schlagenhauf being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Emilija Ceranic winning 2 and Eden Sophie Schlagenhauf winning 0.
- The last match between Emilija Ceranic and Eden Sophie Schlagenhauf was at the Nuernberg, 22-08-2016, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Emilija Ceranic getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:5:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Emilija Ceranic has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Eden Sophie Schlagenhauf has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Emilija Ceranic has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Eden Sophie Schlagenhauf has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Emilija Ceranic has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Eden Sophie Schlagenhauf has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Emilija Ceranic vs Eden Sophie Schlagenhauf Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Ceranic vs E. S. Schlagenhauf H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:5:0 | Average Match Time | 1:5:0 |
| 70% (33/47) | 1st Serve % | 55% (30/55) |
| 64% (21/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (18/30) |
| 64% (9/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 24% (6/25) |
| 67% (6/9) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (2/2) |
| 56% (31/55) | Return Points Win % | 36% (17/47) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Ceranic 0%, Schlagenhauf 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Ceranic 0%, Schlagenhauf 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Ceranic 0%, Schlagenhauf 0%.
E. Ceranic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-1 1-6 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(10) 4-6 7-6(1) | ||
Q2 | L | 6-1 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||
E. S. Schlagenhauf Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | L | 6-3 7-6(6) | ||
Q2 | L | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-0 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 7-5 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||

E. Ceranic vs E. S. Schlagenhauf Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 37.74% (20/33) | YTD Win/Loss | 32.26% (10/21) |
| 37.82% (45/74) | Sets Win/Loss | 33.33% (22/44) |
| 44.39% (459/575) | Games Win/Loss | 42.81% (244/326) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Hard Win/Loss | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 38.78% (19/30) | Clay Win/Loss | 32.00% (8/17) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 2 | Aces Total | 13 |
| 0.02 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 22 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 254.43 | Average Opponent Rank | 36.84 |
| 71% (107/151) | 1st Serve % | 47% (115/244) |
| 46% (49/107) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (66/115) |
| 39% (17/44) | 2nd Serve Win % | 27% (35/129) |
| 73% (11/15) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (9/18) |
| 47% (66/139) | Return Points Win % | 40% (92/230) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Challenger W/L | 14.29% (1/6) |
| 37.25% (19/32) | Futures W/L | 37.50% (9/15) |
| 37% (19/52) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 32% (10/31) |
| 33% (3/9) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
| 57% (8/14) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 100% (15/15) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (9/8) |
| 0% (15/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (9/1) |
| 11% (38/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (22/2) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction09:20 AM 18/11/25
Prediction05:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction01:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 18/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
08:35
H2H 0-0
12:30
H2H 0-0
13:30
H2H 0-0
13:30
H2H 0-0
13:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal